Research areas

Questions our platform can help answer

We focus on studies where a working, clinician-connected app is the hard part. Each area below maps to capabilities already running in production.

Focus areas

Where we partner

We do not lead the science. Investigators set the questions, design, and outcomes. We make the intervention real, reliable, and well documented.

  • Eating-disorder recovery between sessions

    Feasibility, acceptability, and engagement of a digital companion used alongside outpatient treatment such as family-based treatment and enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy. Patients complete brief check-ins; the treating team sees them with patient consent.

  • ARFID and repeated food exposure

    Clinician-guided food exposure with an all-time record of foods tried and repeat attempts, modeled on established repeated-taste-exposure approaches. Suited to studies of exposure dose, variety, and family involvement.

  • Clinician workflow and measurement-based care

    How between-session data changes the visit: review time per patient-week, which signals clinicians act on, and how standardized questionnaires fit routine care.

  • Family and caregiver involvement

    Scoped caregiver access to meals and check-ins, built for family-based treatment, with guardian consent for minors and a transition at the age of majority.

  • Safety by design

    Patient experiences without calorie, weight, or score feedback, and escalation paths when a patient reports distress. Useful for studies comparing configurations or measuring unintended effects.

  • Companion apps for other conditions

    A family of companion health apps on the same shared platform, available as starting points for studies outside eating disorders.

Study designs

What the platform supports

Usability and readiness testing

Task-based sessions with clinicians and lived-experience contributors before a build is frozen.

Randomized pilots

App access assigned per participant, with usual-care arms that never see the app.

Configuration comparisons

Different feature sets per arm, each tied to a documented version.

Implementation studies

Rollout to clinics with workload, adoption, and fidelity measures.

Boundaries

What we will not claim

Pippa does not diagnose, prescribe nutrition, replace psychotherapy, or provide crisis care.

We describe our tools as adjuncts to professional treatment and leave conclusions about effectiveness to the evidence. Proposals we join state the same limits.

Working on one of these questions?

Tell us your aims and the mechanism you are targeting.